<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>E-Dribble &#187; addictionary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infosprite.com/tag/addictionary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infosprite.com</link>
	<description>vaccuum packed mindless ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:33:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I thought they were going to try something &#8220;new&#8221;.</title>
		<link>http://www.infosprite.com/2009/07/27/i-thought-they-were-going-to-try-something-new/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infosprite.com/2009/07/27/i-thought-they-were-going-to-try-something-new/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>schwim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humorous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addictionary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosprite.com/?p=572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an effort to win back some of the readers that are ditching formal news sites, The New York Times is going to implement Addictionary, a system that creates fake words and creates definitions for them, through user input. While others view it as something new for the news sites, I see it as just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to win back some of the readers that are ditching formal news sites, The New York Times is going to implement <a title="I'm flabberedulous(flabbergasted, yet incredulous at the same time)." href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10296150-2.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-5" target="_blank">Addictionary, a system that creates fake words and creates definitions for them, through user input</a>.</p>
<p>While others view it as something new for the news sites, I see it as just an extension.  They&#8217;ve been printing fake news for ages.  Why not throw a couple made up words in there as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infosprite.com/2009/07/27/i-thought-they-were-going-to-try-something-new/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
