<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>E-Dribble &#187; copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infosprite.com/tag/copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infosprite.com</link>
	<description>vaccuum packed mindless ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:33:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I didn&#8217;t know you could copyright &#8220;asinine&#8221;.</title>
		<link>http://www.infosprite.com/2009/03/31/i-didnt-know-you-could-copyright-asinine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infosprite.com/2009/03/31/i-didnt-know-you-could-copyright-asinine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>schwim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosprite.com/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A debate has sprung up concerning whether Twitter posts should be protected under copyright. For those of you that haven&#8217;t had the pleasure of coming across it, Twitter is a micro-blogging system in the fact that you are only allowed 140 characters per post. To put this into perspective, the previous sentence exceeds Twitter&#8217;s post [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a title="Is too!  Is not!" href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090329/2229284297.shtml" target="_blank">debate has sprung up</a> concerning whether Twitter posts should be protected under copyright.</p>
<p>For those of you that haven&#8217;t had the pleasure of coming across it, <a title="Tweet." href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a> is a micro-blogging system in the fact that you are only allowed 140 characters per post.</p>
<p>To put this into perspective, the previous sentence exceeds Twitter&#8217;s post restriction.  It&#8217;s got 25 characters too many.</p>
<p><span id="more-287"></span>On the front page of Twitter, they have quotes from really important people that you should try to emulate, telling you what a great thing Twitter is.</p>
<p>From : <cite class="vcard"><strong class="fn">Eric Nuzum</strong>, <span class="title">Author of The Dead Travel Fast</span></cite></p>
<blockquote><p>If you aren&#8217;t familiar with Twitter, it is one of those things, like MySpace, that sounds totally ridiculous and stupid when you first hear about it. But once you start using it, you realize how much fun it is.</p></blockquote>
<p>Eric obviously doesn&#8217;t follow the tweet(what they call a Twitter post.  I always thought &#8220;twit&#8221; was more applicable.)  format, as his accolades tip the scales at a hefty 210 characters.  These two sentences could not be on his Twitter feed.</p>
<p>Need more info about it?  Read <a title="Well, we'd tweet, but some employee's names have too many characters." href="http://blog.twitter.com/" target="_blank">Twitter&#8217;s own blog</a>.  That&#8217;s right, a blog.  They don&#8217;t use Twitter to tell you about Twitter.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at some of the random posts on Twitter today(I swear to God that I didn&#8217;t pick the most asinine of the group, these are first come, first serve using a search for &#8220;i&#8221;):</p>
<blockquote><p><span id="msgtxt1424608983" class="msgtxt en">its raining&#8230; <strong>i</strong> need to invest in an umbrella soon. sigh&#8230;</span></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><span id="msgtxt1424608964" class="msgtxt en">OMG BANANA BREAD! <strong>I</strong> love my coworkers. ^__^</span></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><span id="msgtxt1424608949" class="msgtxt en"><strong>I</strong> hate my computer.</span></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><span id="msgtxt1424608919" class="msgtxt en">If <strong>I</strong> reach 2000 followers today, 2 lucky people will receive a brand new 80GB PS3. Please RT</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span class="msgtxt en">So the big question is this:  Should these be protected under copyright law?  Should &#8220;OMG BANANA BREAD!&#8221; or  &#8220;i need to invest in an umbrella soon. sigh&#8230;&#8221;  have the same protection as &#8220;The Great Gatsby&#8221; or &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221;?</span></p>
<p><span class="msgtxt en">I&#8217;m sure the authors of the above works think so.  After all, they think so much of themselves that they don&#8217;t doubt for a second that your day is incomplete until you know their official stance on banana bread.</span></p>
<p><span class="msgtxt en">Twitter is to the written language what &#8220;Guitar Hero&#8221; is to a musician. An affront.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span class="msgtxt en">For those of you more accustomed to the Twitter format, I&#8217;ll be happy to condense this into a tweet.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span class="msgtxt en">OMG I&#8217;m so bitchy today.  BRB I gotta take a dump.<br />
</span></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infosprite.com/2009/03/31/i-didnt-know-you-could-copyright-asinine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
